Good, bad, I'm trying to get away from labels, but I'll let everyone here decide which part is which.
Quote: "The results mean those who have already been infected with COVID-19 gain no additional benefits from vaccination, while those who have not been infected with COVID-19 receive maximum benefit from vaccination."
The virus provokes an immune response (which is why you end up getting over the virus). I can't get over actual scientists pretending that an artificial induced immune response would somehow confer any substantial benefit onto those who've already overcome the virus with a natural immune response--especially this early (maybe in a couple of years if the immunity wanes? But we have no evidence of substantial waning immunity--people who got the first SARS virus seem to still have immunizing anti-bodies and t-cells decades later. It's just so obviously motivated reasoning on the part of the "scientists")
