Dear THCs,
As we fidget in the middle of this paradigm shift taking place, I find it more important than ever to take an interest in 9/11. Recently, I have listened to the researches led by Judy Wood on the use of directed-energy weapons to bring down the WTC towers on September 11, 2001.
In fact, the THC Episode with Judy Wood is what convinced me to subscribe to THC+, so I you could say I'm a big fan of hers. After having read the book, I was amazed by the quality and meticulousness of her investigation.
If you haven't listened to her episode yet, just do it ASAP. Episode 2/21/16 THC
There is also a video series put together by Irrefutable TV on Youtube, which is very shortened adaptation of her book.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r51a2HnAXCQ
I'm curious what people here think of this? The exploration delves deep into Field Effects, including Tornadoes and Hurricane phenomena as well as Free Energy (or as she calls it directed-energy weapons). This is the same technology as Active Denial Systems developed for riot control. Only at a much higher intensity.
Much love.
PS: The book was expensive ($80 Canadian) but I would be happy to share it with you if you can think of any easy way to scan 500 pages.)
Hey Polo! I really liked that episode too. It was interesting to hear a new perspective on the topic. I'm still reading her book. I'm not convinced of her thesis but if nothing else its a great collection of primary source info.
Cheers,
BigSkyBandit
The thing about 9/11 is it's very difficult to decipher what actually happened that day. I agree with a lot of what Judy says in that the image of the buildings coming down did not resemble what we'd see with only explosives. However, it's proven that explosive materials were used. What are we seeing? I've been looking at it for 7 years & I still don't know. I guarantee I've watched those collapses over 1000 times & I still scratch my head. Directed Energy Weapons exist, we know that. But, what happens when one is used? None of us really know because those types of weapons are classified as fuck! I commend Judy Wood for coming up with an out of the box hypothesis.
9/11 is similar to the JFK assassination in that the water is so god damn muddy it's difficult to tell up from down.
The burned cars away from ground zero on certain vectors add so much weight to Dr. Wood's question/hypotheses. But what I see in the overall picture here, with all the evidence I've viewed is, there was redundancy through many technologies, and those performing each technological approach, did their parts within their own compartmentalizations, and each with their own means and motive.
One thing that has come of this multiple prong approach is, we, the public, have tended to seize upon one scenario as the script and view the other answers to the questions as something that takes away from our own. Yes, there was thermite. Yes, the core columns were collapsed from within. Yes, clearly defined steel stanchions turn to dust as they fell through clear air. The only thing I doubt now is that the planes were real as more than holographic projections.
I think we got to see something of the future of warfare on Earth, and if this is true, Earth has little to celebrate in such a future, for what would be the use for those who wield such technology but death and slavery for the rest?
satyagraha wrote: The burned cars away from ground zero on certain vectors add so much weight to Dr. Wood's question/hypotheses. But what I see in the overall picture here, with all the evidence I've viewed is, there was redundancy through many technologies, and those performing each technological approach, did their parts within their own compartmentalizations, and each with their own means and motive.
One thing that has come of this multiple prong approach is, we, the public, have tended to seize upon one scenario as the script and view the other answers to the questions as something that takes away from our own. Yes, there was thermite. Yes, the core columns were collapsed from within. Yes, clearly defined steel stanchions turn to dust as they fell through clear air. The only thing I doubt now is that the planes were real as more than holographic projections.
I think we got to see something of the future of warfare on Earth, and if this is true, Earth has little to celebrate in such a future, for what would be the use for those who wield such technology but death and slavery for the rest?
I agree with everything you said except I think the planes were added in production & ALL of the witnesses controlled. Although, It wouldn't be out of realm of possibility to use holograms.
trintdaddy wrote: I agree with everything you said except I think the planes were added in production & ALL of the witnesses controlled. Although, It wouldn't be out of realm of possibility to use holograms.
It never occurred to me that there were no planes that day hitting the towers, but a good case for video editing and/or holograms has been presented by video editing experts and people with insider connections like John Lear.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gORu-68SHpE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQBlv7sZGVE
Here's an interesting channel at YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQLIA-Z7p7L9fYsSlJ2f9wA
On a personal note, I live adjacent to a large expanse of private timberlands where the military conducts lots of training ops, especially airborne. One day while hiking, I heard a loud sound and spun around to see some kind of small aircraft at less than a mile away, flying just above the ridge tops. The sound reminded me of films of German V1 "buzz bomb" WWII rockets (pulsed ramjet). Whatever I was seeing, no sooner than I had focused my eyes on it, it vanished, straightaway. It abruptly went into invisibility and silence. I do not know what I saw and heard. I just know I saw and heard it disappear.
September Clues certainly proves aspects of fakery. There's proven deception at play on the part of the film maker, though. I still enjoy that film a lot.
How about this... almost everyone who actually filmed planes that day were 3d specialists, producers & film makers.
Check this out -
https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=4CATMG46DZ0
Thank you, sir!
I'm in agreement with J P Farrell and his theroy that a 3rd unknown party were the ones with the tech that J Wood alludes to.
Makes more sense than just it was the US govt.
nickzeptepi wrote: Makes more sense than just it was the US govt.
But someone with satellite weapons and/or AWACS?
satyagraha wrote: But someone with satellite weapons and/or AWACS?
Listen to his stuff, he paints a credible picture of a international faction that has all the exotic tech fully working and have been using it since 9/11 to demonstrate there capabilities.
Would be a good topic & guest
Maybe I should have said, "But someone with satellite weapons and/or AWACS, and Dick Cheney? " 😎
I also think it's good to keep in context those dancing Israeli and their Mossad connections. Again, with the bigger picture in mind, the events of 9.11 seem to have been orchestrated for the benefit of Israelo-Zionist to send wage an indefinite war in the Middle East as described by PNAC(Project for a New American Century), led no less by the world police, USA.
The only reason I'm pointing this out is because those same 'agent-provocateurs' have also been linked to civil unrest in other countries, including past riots in Paris (possibly Charlie Hebdo, LaCigale and Nice attacks?). Former journalist and author Udo Ulfkotte of books such as Journalists for Hire, was found dead in January 2017. All in all, a rabbit hole that doesn't cease to grow.
Interesting passage on the Metsada from Waltzing with the Wicked by David Sheskin.
