Sylvie has been one of my favorite guests. She brings up interesting points about the timeline of our history that are completely messing with my mind (in a good way). Are people like Graham Hancock, who have also questioned the timeline of our history and explored the idea of lost civilizations aware of her research? Has he had any thoughts or comments on this research? I am currently reading his book Fingerprints of the Gods and am trying to wrap my mind around both views, if that is the best way to put it. I also understand Graham wrote that book in 1995 and new shit seems to be coming out daily. Hopefully my question is clear in regards to Sylvie saying most discoveries are younger then we might think and Graham saying they are older then we might think. Anyone that can bring some clarity feel free to dive in!
Have you ever come across Jan Irvin's research on Hancock? He finds links between Graham & the Darwin/Huxley line. Check out his Brain Database on gnosticmedia for that info.
Hancock is more of a mainstream "historian" than he'd have you believe. I'm a fan, but his data certainly doesn't mesh with Sylvia's. If she is right, Graham's role becomes evident. I've seen more than 1 researcher who believes graham is Esalen's puppet. I know Jan Irvin is not super popular around these parts (see his episode of THC), but he has done decent work showing the connection between Huxley & MK ULTRA, & Graham to Huxley. I'm not on either side of the debate, just throwing out what I know of the topic (admittedly not much). Search for Irvin's Brain Database for more info.
take care
Skip to 12:52 of this video -
Found this... seems interesting. I haven't read it yet so i can't vouch for its legitimacy. I'm looking forward to reading later today.
On one of his visits to Coast to Coast AM, Hancock was extremely rude and insulting to a caller who didn't buy his hypotheses. I personally don't buy his version either, so I could be said to be not very objective. I think Velikovsky has the best call for timing the epochs from the flood, forward. Of course, that totally destroys my creds amongst the movers and shakers, but Hell, I'm already an electric universe, hollow Earther, so I'm basically fucked anyway.
satyagraha wrote: On one of his visits to Coast to Coast AM, Hancock was extremely rude and insulting to a caller who didn't buy his hypotheses. I personally don't buy his version either, so I could be said to be not very objective. I think Velikovsky has the best call for timing the epochs from the flood, forward. Of course, that totally destroys my creds amongst the movers and shakers, but Hell, I'm already an electric universe, hollow Earther, so I'm basically fucked anyway.
lol - yeah, they're having none of that business.
GH is a fabian socialist to boot.
