The richest man in the world and his shitty moon-mobile

He should of stood on the other side. Then it could have used those giant fly swatters to take revenge for creating it.

The only explanation I can ascribe is that they didn't want anything too flashy and aerodynamic to show up the original tin can lander.

Ok, don't spread this around, but I have some *very high level* deep state contacts, and they gave me a sneak peak at what the astronauts are going to be wearing...

It's hard for me to believe this guy doesn't have access to electrogravitic crafts at this point. So yeah, I do agree and think he's trolling us..

It seems common in the industry too. I believe it was Paul Laviolette, the previous guest on THC. In his book on such crafts, he pointed out that the B2 Bomber actually is a hybrid kerosene (assumption based on standard jetfuel) and electrogravitic craft, by making use of positive-negative charge to create a bubble around it, with a positive feedback loop type of propulsion (like Schauberger's trouts). But basically, all that is publicly reveiled, is that it's a standard plane albeit cool-looking (inspired by the shape of falcons during flight if I'm not mistaken).

Also, I used to be an Apple fan (I know.. oh the times they are a-changing) and they used to test their latest, unreleased hardware in regular model covers so that they can test it in the field without leaks. (though that didnt work so well now, did it?)

So yeah, all this to say, Bezos is surely hiding some juicy stuff behind.

edit: It reminded me of this cool thing:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9b0J29OzAU

Yes, EP, and how well does all that with what Dr. Pollack was saying about electrostatics and flight. Boom!

I also have an eagle's nest visible from my house and I watch them laboriously circle every morning to build up height. I was sure it wasn't 'updrafts' as they just circle on the spot around their roosting tree, so for me, the good doctor's explanation is very apt. They are building up a charge.

Back to all the moon mania at the moment, what is the goal here? They've got all their puppets singing and dancing about moon and Mars missions, but to what end? Does it also have anything to do with the fact that Dr. pollack is speaking about his amazing research and is somehow not dead?

There's some weird in-fighting going on. NASA and NOAA are pushing back against the 5G rollout citing interference with weather mapping satellites,

"The current FCC proposal would have a significant negative impact on the transmission of critical Earth science data – an American taxpayer investment spanning decades and billions of dollars,” they wrote in a Feb. 28 letter to Pai."

FCC responds

In the March 8 letter, Pai rejected that invitation, saying the matter was settled. “Notwithstanding the absence of any technical basis for an objection over the past two years to the FCC’s well-established protection limits, NTIA

declined to agree with the FCC’s balanced approach on this issue,” Pai wrote. To settle the matter, the State Department, acting as the arbiter, agreed with the FCC approach.

Pai further scolded the NTIA and NASA for “actively lobbying foreign delegations and key industry players” to undercut the FCC’s position. “Such actions are unacceptable,” he wrote.

rani wrote: There's some weird in-fighting going on. NASA and NOAA are pushing back against the 5G rollout citing interference with weather mapping satellites,

"The current FCC proposal would have a significant negative impact on the transmission of critical Earth science data – an American taxpayer investment spanning decades and billions of dollars,” they wrote in a Feb. 28 letter to Pai."

FCC responds

In the March 8 letter, Pai rejected that invitation, saying the matter was settled. “Notwithstanding the absence of any technical basis for an objection over the past two years to the FCC’s well-established protection limits, NTIA

declined to agree with the FCC’s balanced approach on this issue,” Pai wrote. To settle the matter, the State Department, acting as the arbiter, agreed with the FCC approach.

Pai further scolded the NTIA and NASA for “actively lobbying foreign delegations and key industry players” to undercut the FCC’s position. “Such actions are unacceptable,” he wrote.

https://www.smombiegate.org/elon-musks-5g-from-space-project-his-biggest-folly-yet/

so, does 5g only work a few hundred feet or thousands of miles? enquiring minds want to know.

The satellites are the backbone and will work with ground stations to saturate.
https://www.smombiegate.org/5g-nightmare-spacex-requests-fcc-permission-to-operate-1m-earth-stations/

Elana Freeland's book, Under an Ionized Sky was a great primer into this topic. A mind-earthquake, involving meticulous research on the implementation of a space fence, and its implications to the biosphere, including the 5G plan.

btw, thanks to Nick for previously posting about the Avalon library. Incredible resource.

PS: synchronicity with Sam Tripoli & Tinfoil Hat podcast:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-CX50MrvhU